Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of patients with re-revision for reasons other than periprosthetic fracture

From: High survivorship of highly cross-linked polyethylene in revision Total hip Arthroplasty: a minimum 10-year follow-up study

Patient no.

Sex

Age at revision

Reason for revision

Method of revision

Acetabular cup at revision (size)

Acetabular liner at revision (thickness)

Femoral head at revision (size)

Acetabular cup inclination at revision (°)

Acetabular cup abduction at revision (°)

Months from revision to re-revision

Reason for re-revison

Method of re-revision

1

M

43

Aseptic loosening

Cup revision

Trilogy (66 mm)

Longevity (13.3 mm)

Metal (28 mm)

38.3

9.3

80

Aseptic loosening

Cup revision

2

F

65

Aseptic loosening

Cup & stem revision

Trilogy (48 mm)

Longevity (6.2 mm)

Ceramic (28 mm)

44.0

12.5

6

Recurrent dislocation

Cup revision

3

F

62

Aseptic loosening

Cup revision

Trilogy (48 mm)

Longevity (6.2 mm)

Metal (28 mm)

38.0

10.5

78

Infection

2 stage cup & stem re-revision

4

M

75

Infection

Cup & stem revision

Trilogy (64 mm)

Longevity (12.3 mm)

Ceramic (28 mm)

36.4

8.5

1

Infection

Resection arthroplasty

5

M

56

Aseptic loosening

Cup revision

Trilogy (56 mm)

Longevity (8.3 mm)

Metal (28 mm)

49.1

13.0

50

Infection

2 stage cup re-revision