Skip to main content

Table 1 The major characteristics of the included trails

From: Is gap balancing superior to measured resection technique in total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis

 

Year of publication

Study design

Sample Size

Mean Age

Gender (F/M)

Pathologies (OA/RA)

Prosthesis design

Length of follow-up

GB

MR

GB

MR

GB

MR

GB

MR

Babazadeh [15]

2014

RCT

51

52

69.9

70.2

37/14

30/22

45/5

50/2

CR

2 years

Baier [9]

2014

RCT

19

21

72.4

70.0

14/5

12/9

19/0

21/0

CR

6 months

Nikolaides [14]

2014

Prospective cohort

29

34

70.0

71.0

NR

NR

20/0

34/0

PS

7 days

Luyckx [8]

2012

Prospective cohort

48

48

65.0

64.0

30/18

34/14

48/0

48/0

PS

NR

Singh [12]

2012

RCT

26

26

73.0

73.0

NR

NR

26/0

26/0

CR

2 years

Lee HJ [13]

2011

RCT

30

30

68.9

68.9

28/2

28/2

26/4

30/0

CR

2 years

Pang [11]

2011

RCT

70

70

68.0

70.0

60/10

58/12

70/0

70/0

CR

2 years

Sabbioni [20]

2011

Prospective cohort

31

36

67.0

69.0

25/6

28/8

31/0

36/0

CR

7 days

Lee DH [24]

2010

RCT

60

56

66.0

67.0

57/3

54/2

60/0

56/0

CR

3 months

Tigani [19]

2010

Prospective cohort

57

66

67.0

69.0

42/15

46/20

55/1

64/2

PS

7 months

Dennis [23]

2010

Prospective cohort

20

40

NR

NR

NR

NR

20/0

40/0

PS, CR

2 years

  1. GB Gap balancing, MR Measured resection, RCT Randomized controlled trials, NR Not reported, CR Cruciate-retaining prostheses, PS Posterior cruciate-stabilizing prostheses