Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of 7 studies

From: Effect of tourniquet application on cement penetration in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

Study

Groups

Patients (n)

M/F

Mean age

(y)

BMI

Knee

(right/left)

Cement (g)

Cement manufacturers

Tourniquet pressure (mmHg)

Pfitzner 2014 [5]

Tourniquet

45

21/24

69.3 (47–85)

27.8 (18.5–38.1)

NA

40

Palacos R®; Heraeus

350

Non-tourniquet

45

11/34

70.5 (50–90)

26 (18.5–33.9)

NA

Vertullo 2017 [14]

Tourniquet

20

10/10

67.85 ± 6.91

30.43 ± 5.07

10/10

80

Palacos R + G; Zimmer

300

Non-tourniquet

20

11/9

65.65 ± 8.54

31 ± 5.31

13/7

Ozkunt 2018 [15]

Tourniquet

24

NA

65.05 (52–81)

NA

NA

NA

OrCem 3; European Medical

NA

Non-tourniquet

25

NA

65.05 (52–81)

NA

NA

Jawhar 2018 [17]

Tourniquet

43

16/27

70 ± 6.8

31.9 ± 5.7

18/25

40

SmartSet; DePuySynthes

360

Non-tourniquet

43

16/27

71 ± 6.8

31.9 ± 5.7

26/17

Touzopoulos 2019 [18]

Tourniquet

50

42/8

70.73 ± 6.56

31.04 ± 5.43

NA

20

Palacos R + G®; Heraeus

350

Non-tourniquet

50

42/8

69.92 ± 6.89

31.12 ± 3.95

NA

Herndon 2019 [19]

Tourniquet

70

28/42

67 ± 9.2

NA

NA

80

Simplex; Stryker

250

Non-tourniquet

70

26/44

67.5 ± 8.3

NA

NA

Dincel 2020 [20]

Tourniquet

74

15/59

65.34 ± 7.94

32.83 ± 5.80

40/34

NA

Hi-Fatigue; Zimmer Biomet

150 + systolic pressure

Non-tourniquet

96

20/76

66.12 ± 8.78

32.72 ± 5.73

55/41

  1. NA not available; BMI body mass index; y year; g gram