Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient descriptive statistics at baseline

From: Does functional planning, 3D templating and patient-specific instrumentation improve accuracy in total hip replacement?— a randomized controlled trial

 

Group A Standard THA (n=27)

Group B OPS THA (n=27)

All (n=54)

Age at randomization (years, mean, SD)

57.3 (9.8)

58.8 (7.4)

58.1 (8.6)

Sex:Female (n, % of valid group)

12 (44.4)

18 (66.7)

30 (55.6)

Ethnicity: White British (n, %)

24 (88.9)

23 (85.2)

47 (87)

BMI (kg/m2, mean, SD)

29.7 (5.0)

30.3 (4.8)

30.0 (4.9)

Study Hip: Left (n, % of valid group)

9 (33.3)

10 (37.0)

19 (35.2)

Previous spinal surgery: Yes (n, % of valid group)

*

*

3 (5.7)

Known spinal deformity: Yes (n, % of valid group)

4 (15.4)

4 (14.8)

8 (15.1)

Neurological disorder: Yes (n, % of valid group)

2 (7.7)

2 (7.4)

4 (7.5)

Hip pathology: Osteoarthritis: Yes (n, % of valid group)

*

*

53 (98.1)

Length of legs: (n, % of valid group)

 About the same

14 (51.9)

15 (55.6)

29 (53.7)

 Left leg longer

4 (14.8)

8 (29.6)

12 (22.2)

 Right leg longer

4 (14.8)

2 (7.4)

6 (11.1)

Unsure

5 (18.5)

2 (7.4)

7 (13.0)

Walking aids: None (n, % of valid group)

17 (63.0)

19 (70.4)

36 (66.7)