Skip to main content

Table 3 Description and differences between training dataset and test dataset

From: Prediction of gap balancing based on 2-D radiography in total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis patients

Variables

All (nā€‰=ā€‰110)

Training (nā€‰=ā€‰99)

Test (nā€‰=ā€‰11)

P-value

x

5.638ā€‰Ā±ā€‰2.75

5.632ā€‰Ā±ā€‰2.81

5.699ā€‰Ā±ā€‰2.25

0.944

y

10.181ā€‰Ā±ā€‰5.58

10.034ā€‰Ā±ā€‰5.66

11.503ā€‰Ā±ā€‰4.73

0.356

z

5.394ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.78

5.419ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.92

5.171ā€‰Ā±ā€‰2.15

0.748

w

16.6ā€‰Ā±ā€‰7.72

16.518ā€‰Ā±ā€‰8.08

17.34ā€‰Ā±ā€‰2.97

0.503

Tibial cut

10.575ā€‰Ā±ā€‰4.33

10.66ā€‰Ā±ā€‰4.49

9.813ā€‰Ā±ā€‰2.3

0.319

Femoral cut

7.175ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.22

7.174ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.3

7.18ā€‰Ā±ā€‰2.49

0.994

Post Condyle

8.723ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.77

8.6ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.88

9.826ā€‰Ā±ā€‰2.52

0.17

Joint gap

17.822ā€‰Ā±ā€‰6.27

17.733ā€‰Ā±ā€‰6.53

18.62ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.15

0.449