Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristic of included studies

From: Accelerometer-based navigation vs. conventional techniques for total knee arthroplasty (TKA): a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Author

Year

Country

Implant

Device

Number

Age

BMI

Outcomes

ABN

CONV

ABN

CONV

ABN

CONV

Ali

2021

Australia

Legion (Smith and Nephew)

KneeAlign 2

81

78

68.1

68.2

NA

NA

KOOS WOMAC Complications

NCT03111407

2021

Spain

NA

iASSIST

44

26

67.3 ± 7.9

70.3 ± 7.4

30.4 ± 5.5

30.7 ± 4.6

MA KSS EQ-5D Complications

Kosuke

2021

Japan

Persona (Zimmer)

iASSIST

42

41

73.3 ± 9.0

76.1 ± 9.0

NA

NA

KSS OKS EQ-5D CFA CTA TS OT BL

Minoda

2020

Japan

Vanguard (Zimmer)

KneeAlign 2

45

45

76 ± 5

74 ± 7

26.5 ± 4.4

27.4 ± 4.2

MA CFA CTA OT KSS EQ-5D

Xu

2019

China

Genesis II (Smith and Nephew)

i-Join

39

40

65.3 ± 6.8

65.3 ± 7.6

NA

NA

MA CFA OT BL Complications

Kinney

2018

America

Persona (Zimmer)

iASSIST

25

25

66.4 ± 2.3

65 ± 2.0

30.4 ± 1.2

31.1 ± 1.2

MA CFA CTA OT BL Complications

Ikawa

2017

Japan

Vanguard (Zimmer)

KneeAlign 2

121

120

74 ± 6.8

74.1 ± 6.8

26.1 ± 3.7

26.8 ± 4.1

MA CFA OT BL

Gharaibeh

2017

Australia

Legion (Smith and Nephew)

KneeAlign

89

90

69.2 ± 8.7

69 ± 8.3

29.6 ± 5.4

29.2 ± 4.8

MA CFA CTA TS

Thiengwittayaporn

2016

Thailand

NexGen HiFlex (Zimmer)

iASSIST

40

40

68.0 ± 8.0

65.9 ± 6.3

26.6 ± 3.7

26.6 ± 3.7

MA CFA CTA TS OT BL

Nam

2014

America

NA

KneeAlign

47

47

67.1 ± 7.5

66.1 ± 10.1

31.1 ± 5.9

31.2 ± 5.6

MA CFA CTA TS

  1. KOOS Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, WOMAC The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, MA Mechanical alignment, CFA Coronal femoral axis, CTA Coronal tibial axis, TS Tibial Slope, EQ-5D EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire, OT Operation time, BL Blood loss