Skip to main content
Download PDF

Incidence and risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) after primary hip hemiarthroplasty: an analysis of the ACS-NSQIP hip fracture procedure targeted database

Arthroplasty volume 5, Article number: 1 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Primary hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) is frequently utilized to treat geriatric hip fractures, which are associated with significantly higher morbidity and mortality. While not particularly common, surgical site infection (SSI) is a major complication that frequently requires revision surgery in a frail population. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of and risk factors for SSI after HHA in hip fracture patients.

Materials and methods

This retrospective cohort study was performed using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Geriatric patients (65+) who underwent HHA for non-pathologic, traumatic hip fractures between 2016–2017 were included. Demographic variables, comorbidities, operative variables, and complications were compared between "SSI" and "non-SSI" groups. Multivariate regression identified independent risk factors for postoperative SSI. Significance was set at P = 0.05.

Results

A total of 6169 patients were included. The overall incidence of SSI was 1.3%. SSI was significantly associated with body mass index (BMI), preoperative functional status, congestive heart failure, chronic corticosteroid use, intraoperative time, sepsis, wound dehiscence, readmission within 30-days, and reoperation. On multivariate analysis, chronic steroid use (OR: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.13–4.70), BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 (OR: 3.59, 95% CI: 1.57–8.18), and intraoperative time ≥120 mins (OR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.08–4.27) were found to be independent risk factors.

Conclusions

Postoperative SSI is a serious complication that is responsible for prolonged hospital stays, increased mortality, and greater healthcare costs. Here, we identified multiple risk factors for SSI after primary HHA in the US elderly population.

Introduction

Geriatric hip fractures are common traumatic injuries encountered by orthopedic surgeons [1]. The incidence of hip fractures continues to grow partially due to the aging of global populations and an increasing frequency of comorbidities. Certain projections estimate more than 700,000 cases will appear annually by 2050, at a net cost of $15 billion in the United States alone [2, 3]. Current trends suggest that primary hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) is the procedure of choice for repair of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients [4]. However, HHA has been associated with a higher rate of complications compared to elective total hip arthroplasty (THA), and morbidity and mortality in geriatric hip fractures remain high [1, 5].

Infections comprise a substantial fraction of postoperative complications following HHA [1]. In fact, numerous studies have investigated the incidence and underlying risk factors for infections after hip fracture surgery, including pneumonia, urinary tract infections (UTIs), sepsis, and C. difficile colitis [6,7,8]. Surgical site infection (SSI) is another major infectious complication commonly seen after hemiarthroplasty and is responsible for prolonged hospital stays, frequent readmissions, increased mortality, and greater healthcare costs [9]. SSI can cause serious damage to the repaired joint and surrounding soft tissues, often compromising the arthroplasty and requiring revision surgery. This is of particular concern among the elderly. The prevalence of concomitant diseases that are associated with infection risk (i.e., diabetes mellitus, atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease, malignancies) commonly increases with age [10, 11]. The increased incidence of cancer among elderly persons also has implications for infection risk with respect to immunoablative chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Additionally, the elderly population is disproportionately affected by inadequate nutritional intake—another correlate of infection risk—perhaps due to the diminished digestive and metabolic functions associated with senescence [12]. Limited mobility, protracted recovery, pathogen exposure in hospitals or long-term care facilities, challenges with self-care, and delayed wound healing may also play a contributory role [13, 14]. However, reported SSI rates after HHA have been highly variable, with estimates ranging between 1.6–10% [15,16,17,18]. Additionally, previous studies aiming to identify the modifiable risk factors for SSI have been limited by small sample sizes, clumping of distinctly different procedures (e.g., closed reduction percutaneous pinning, open reduction internal fixations, intramedullary fixations, THA, and revision surgeries), and subjects of non-US populations [7, 15, 16, 18, 19]. To our knowledge, no report of the predictive factors of SSI after primary HHA in the United States has been published in the literature to date.

The objective of this study was to utilize data from the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to determine the incidence of SSI and categorically describe the risk factors for SSI after HHA in geriatric hip fracture patients. Given the increasing utilization of primary HHA and the persistently high rate of morbidity and mortality after femoral neck fractures, understanding the correlates of postoperative SSI can aid in mitigation of risk and proactive management of vulnerable patients [20].

Materials and methods

Data source

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database and NSQIP Hip Fracture Targeted Procedure Dataset were utilized for the present study. The NSQIP initiative began through the Veteran’s Administration (VA) health system as a quality improvement program in 1994. Its efficacious implementation in the VA health system led to a parallel program for private hospitals in 1998. For the year 2017, the most recent year included in this study, the NSQIP database contained over one million cases collected from approximately 700 hospitals. Risk-adjustment enables each hospital to make a valid comparison of its outcomes with those of other hospitals in order to identify areas for quality improvement.

The NSQIP database prospectively collects over 150 patient-related variables, including but not limited to, demographics, comorbid conditions, and postoperative complications through analysis of medical records, operative reports, and patient interviews. The NSQIP hip fracture targeted procedure dataset utilized herein additionally collects 16 variables specific to hip fracture cases. Data are collected prospectively by clinically-trained personnel using a standardized entry form, and database quality is maintained by on-site surgical clinical reviewers and the NSQIP's internal auditing process, which improves inter-rater reliability and ensure accuracy of data collection. Specific definitions and diagnostic criteria for each variable/complication can be found in the ACS Quality Improvement Program electronic operations manual (http://cqi.facs.org/operationsmanual/mbsaqip/Chapters_and_Appendices/Chapter_4.htm).

Study population

The NSQIP databases for 2016 and 2017 were queried. Patients that underwent hip hemiarthroplasty were identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 27236. For the selection of typical geriatric hip fracture cases, patients under the age of 65 were excluded. This cutoff age was selected based on the World Health Organization's definition of elderly persons as those 65 years and older [21, 22]. Also, patients with hip fracture due to pathologic etiology and those undergoing concomitant interventions were excluded. Those with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 5 or unknown ASA class were excluded. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the presence or absence of postoperative SSI. Postoperative SSI was defined as any superficial incisional, deep incisional, or organ/space SSI occurring within 30 days after the primary procedure. Superficial incisional SSI was classified as involving only the skin or subcutaneous tissue; deep incisional SSI was classified as involving deep soft tissues, such as fascial and muscle layers; organ/space SSI was classified as involving any part of the anatomy (e.g., organs or spaces) other than the incision, which was opened or manipulated during the primary procedure. Specific diagnostic criteria for each SSI type can be found in the ACS Quality Improvement Program electronic operations manual (http://cqi.facs.org/operationsmanual/mbsaqip/Chapters_and_Appendices/Chapter_4.htm).

Patient factors and outcome variables

Demographic factors assessed included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), functional status, and the use of bisphosphonates. Comorbid conditions assessed were congestive heart failure (CHF), hypertension (HTN) requiring medication, current smoking status, dyspnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), dialysis, unintentional weight loss (defined by NSQIP as greater than 10% decrease in body weight in the 6 month interval immediately preceding surgery), diabetes, chronic steroid use, preoperative dementia, preoperative delirium, preoperative pressure sore, preoperative transfusion, and bleeding disorders. Operative variables included operative time and ASA class, grouped by classes 1–2 and 3–4.

Postoperative complications analyzed were myocardial infarction (MI), pneumonia, unplanned re-intubation, failure to wean from ventilator > 48 h postoperatively, acute renal failure, progressive renal insufficiency, wound dehiscence, urinary tract infection (UTI), deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), intraoperative or postoperative transfusion, readmission, reoperation, and mortality.

Statistical analysis

Patient demographic variables, comorbid conditions, operative variables, and postoperative complications were compared between those that did and did not develop SSI. Chi-square test was used for categorical variables and Student's t-test was used for continuous variables. Variables associated with SSI with P-value of less than 0.2 were subsequently controlled in the multivariate analyses, which were performed to identify independent risk factors for SSI. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (Version 9.3, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Statistical significance level was set at P = 0.05.

Results

A total of 6169 geriatric patients (65+) who underwent HHA for femoral neck fracture were identified from the NSQIP database (2016–2017) for inclusion in this study (Table 1). Of these, 80 cases developed postoperative SSI, yielding an overall incidence rate of 1.3%.

Table 1 Demographics of geriatric patients undergoing hip hemiarthroplasty stratified by occurrence of surgical site infection
Full size table

Univariate analysis of patient characteristics identified BMI and preoperative functional status as significant correlates of SSI (P = 0.0019 and P = 0.0029, respectively) (Table 1). Patient age and use of bisphosphonates were not significantly associated with SSI. Comorbid conditions associated with SSI were congestive heart failure and chronic corticosteroid use (P = 0.0359 and P = 0.0205, respectively) (Table 2). Preoperative delirium and bleeding disorders were not significantly associated with postoperative SSI (P = 0.1482 and P = 0.1984, respectively). Increased intraoperative time, but not ASA score, was a significant operative variable associated with SSI (P = 0.0219) (Table 3). Development of postoperative SSI correlated with other postoperative complications, including sepsis, wound dehiscence, readmission within 30-days, and reoperation (P < 0.0001 for all) (Table 4).

Table 2 Comorbid conditions of geriatric patients undergoing hip hemiarthroplasty stratified by occurrence of surgical site infection
Full size table
Table 3 Perioperative variables of geriatrics undergoing hip hemiarthroplasty stratified by occurrence of surgical site infection
Full size table
Table 4 30-day postoperative adverse events in patients undergoing hip hemiarthroplasty stratified by occurrence of surgical site infection
Full size table

Multivariate analysis identified multiple independent predictors for SSI, including obesity classes 2 or 3 (OR = 3.586, 95% CI = 1.572–8.180, P = 0.0261), chronic steroid/immunosuppressant use (OR = 2.304, 95% CI = 1.128–4.704, P = 0.0219), and intraoperative time exceeding 120 mins (OR = 2.148, 95% CI = 1.080–4.270, P = 0.0211) (Table 5). Chronic steroid/immunosuppressant users were defined as patients who were actively undergoing steroid/immunosuppressant therapy for a chronic condition for at least 10 days cumulatively within the 30 days prior to surgery. Intraoperative time was defined as the elapsed time from initial incision to completion of all procedure-related activities in the operating room. Other factors, including sex, baseline functional status, preoperative delirium, or bleeding disorders were not identified as independent predictors for SSI.

Table 5 Multivariate analyses of potential risk factors for surgical site infection after hip hemiarthroplasty in geriatric patients
Full size table

Discussion

The mounting incidence of geriatric hip fractures and persistently high postoperative morbidity and mortality rates are cause for concern among orthopedic surgeons. Although primary HHA is currently the most commonly indicated procedure for traumatic, displaced femoral neck fractures, particularly in elderly patients, HHA suffers from a high rate of infectious complications, including pneumonia [1], UTIs [1], C. difficile colitis [8], and sepsis [7]. Prior literature suggesting that infections are a major source of postoperative morbidity has spurred a growing effort to investigate the incidence and risk factors for such complications. However, these trends remain poorly studied for postoperative SSI in the context of the US geriatric population, despite reports suggesting that SSI is responsible for prolonged hospital stays, increased mortality, and greater healthcare costs [9]. In this study, we aimed to determine the incidence of SSI and categorically describe the risk factors for SSI after hip hemiarthroplasty using 30-day postoperative reports from the NSQIP database.

Analysis of 6169 geriatric hip fracture patients who underwent HHA from 2016–2017 in the United States revealed an overall SSI rate of 1.3% (Table 1). This statistic was slightly lower than incidences reported by studies conducted in other countries, which documented SSI occurrence in 1.6–10% of all cases [15,16,17,18]. Generally, HHA has been associated with a higher risk of complications compared to other hip surgeries, particularly elective procedures such as total hip arthroplasty (THA) [1, 5, 18]. The 90-day postoperative incidence of deep infection after THA was reported to range from 0.2–0.9%, much lower than that of HHA [23].

Multivariate analysis identified three independent risk factors for postoperative SSI in this study cohort: obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2), chronic steroid/immunosuppressant use, and prolonged intraoperative time (Table 5). Numerous studies support the finding that increased BMI correlates with profound risk of SSI after surgical repair of hip fractures, among other complications. Bohl et al. found that patients with BMI of 25–30 kg/m2 and ≥ 30 kg/m2 were more vulnerable to SSI within thirty days of geriatric hip fracture surgery (OR: 1.3 [1.0–1.8] and 2.7 [2.0–3.6], respectively) compared to patients with BMI of < 25 kg/m2 (P < 0.001) [7]. Similarly, Liu et al. reported an elevated risk profile for patients with BMI of > 26.6 kg/m2 (OR: 2.97, P < 0.001) [19]. A more nuanced trend published by Akinleye et al. suggested that while deep SSI risk correlated linearly with increased BMI (P < 0.001) as previously reported, superficial wound infection rates were actually lower among both underweight and morbidly obese patients [24].

Similarly, longer operative time is commonly reported to independently increase the risk of postoperative complications including SSI (Table 3) [18, 19]. Interestingly, one prior study highlighted a potential risk with very short intraoperative time (≤45 mins), perhaps owing to extensive tissue handling or lack of adequate hemostasis resulting in postoperative hematoma and risk of infection [15]. However, short intraoperative time was not associated with postoperative SSI in our investigation. This may be attributed to the larger sample size used in the present study (n = 6169) compared to the previous study (n = 92).

Chronic steroid use has not been previously identified as an independent risk factor, except in the context of "late" SSI (>3 months postoperative) after total and hemiarthroplasty [25]. However, sustained immunosuppression due to steroid therapy would likely render patients vulnerable to infectious complications postoperatively. Overall, preoperative steroid use has been documented as an independent predictor of infection after surgical procedures [26].

Unlike elective THA, hemiarthroplasty is typically performed urgently in the settings of acute hip fractures, particularly in the elderly population. Thus, many of the patient risk factors are non-modifiable in practice. In lieu of preparative lifestyle modifications to mitigate risk, a thorough history taking may help identify patients who are at higher risk of postoperative SSI, including those who are on chronic steroids/immunosuppressants. Additionally, rigorous planning, such as ensuring all surgical equipment is available and ready, familiarizing surgical staff with the equipment, and establishing a dedicated hip fracture team, may help minimize intraoperative time and further reduce risk.

A number of other SSI control measures have been discussed in the orthopedic literature, with ongoing debate regarding the efficacy of certain practices [27]. Generally, these practices can be separated into “standard" procedures that have been extensively adopted and other measures that are used more selectively based on physicians' preference. Standard practices include intraoperative antibiotics, redosing antibiotics intraoperatively, postoperative antibiotic protocol, double gloving, and limiting traffic through the operative room. However, some reported that prophylactic antibiotic administration after wound closure has not demonstrated a significant clinical benefit, instead contributing to antimicrobial resistance after prolonged use [28,29,30,31].

Decolonization with chlorhexidine bath or other topical antimicrobials the night before surgery may be additionally indicated in high-risk patients to reduce the risk of MRSA infection [32,33,34,35]. Intrawound irrigation with Betadine (povidone-iodine) or other surfactant/detergent has been shown to significantly reduce infection rates [36,37,38]. Direct intrawound antibiotic application is another frequently deployed measure in high risks patients. In patients receiving cemented prostheses, evidence from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Registry suggests a benefit of using antibiotic-impregnated cement, although this did not improve risk of revision surgery compared to uncemented prostheses [39].

This study comes with several limitations. As a retrospective investigation, the analyses only demonstrated associations between variables and cannot adequately determine causal relationships. Additionally, measures to minimize SSI risk such as betadine irrigation or intrawound antibiotic use were not recorded in the NSQIP database and therefore could not be accounted for. Finally, outcomes reporting in the NSQIP database is limited to a 30-day postoperative period, and the SSI rate that was reported in the current study may be an underestimation as SSIs occurring outside of this window could not be included. Chronic or late SSI taking place more than 30 days after surgery has been documented previously [40]. Nevertheless, the NSQIP is a powerful, well-established database that has been used previously to examine SSI risk factors for other orthopedic procedures [1, 23, 41,42,43].

Despite limitations of the NSQIP database, the present study provides a thorough assessment of post-HHA SSI incidence and risk factors for geriatric hip fracture patients using a large, US-based patient population. Previous studies have been limited by small sample size and clumping of distinctly different procedures such as THA and revision surgeries. While some studies on the subject have been performed in Europe and Asia, intraoperative and perioperative protocols may differ in other countries, thereby making it challenging to extrapolate results from foreign studies to US patient populations. Here, we reported an overall SSI incidence of 1.3% and identified three major independent predictors of SSI risk: obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2), chronic steroid/immunosuppressant use, and prolonged intraoperative time (≥120 mins). In addition to enhancing the informed consent process, these findings can help orthopedic surgeons identify high-risk patients and proactively implement appropriate SSI control measures. Further research is needed to identify appropriate procedures to reduce SSI risk in the identified populations.

Conclusions

Postoperative SSI is a serious complication that is responsible for prolonged hospital stays, increased mortality, and greater healthcare costs. In this study, we examined the incidence and risk factors for SSI in geriatric patients undergoing primary HHA for femoral neck fracture. The overall incidence of SSI across 6169 patients was 1.3%. Multivariate regression identified three major independent predictors of SSI risk: obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2), chronic steroid/immunosuppressant use, and prolonged intraoperative time (≥120 mins). Despite limitations of the NSQIP database, the findings in this study benefit from a large, US-based patient population and may help orthopedic surgeons proactively identify patients at high risk for postoperative SSI.

Availability of data and materials

All data for this study were extracted from the publicly-available NSQIP database.

References

  1. Sathiyakumar V, Greenberg SE, Molina CS, Thakore RV, Obremskey WT, Sethi MK. Hip fractures are risky business: an analysis of the NSQIP data. Injury. 2015;46(4):703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng SY, Levy AR, Lefaivre KA, Guy P, Kuramoto L, Sobolev B. Geographic trends in incidence of hip fractures: a comprehensive literature review. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(10):2575.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zi-Sheng A, You-Shui G, Zhi-Zhen J, Ting Y, Chang-Qing Z. Hemiarthroplasty vs primary total hip arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck in the elderly: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(4):583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Woon CYL, Moretti VM, Schwartz BE, Goldberg BA. Total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty: US national trends in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017;46(6):E474.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Suarez JC, Arguelles W, Saxena A, Rivera P, Parris D, Veledar E. Hemiarthroplasty vs total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: 2010-2017 trends in complication rates. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(6, Supplement):S262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bliemel C, Buecking B, Hack J, Aigner R, Eschbach D-A, Ruchholtz S, et al. Urinary tract infection in patients with hip fracture: an underestimated event? Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017;17(12):2369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bohl DD, Iantorno SE, Saltzman BM, Tetreault MW, Darrith B, Della Valle CJ. Sepsis within 30 days of geriatric hip fracture surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(10):3114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bovonratwet P, Bohl DD, Russo GS, Ondeck NT, Nam D, Della Valle CJ, et al. How common-and how serious- is Clostridium difficile colitis after geriatric hip fracture? Findings from the NSQIP dataset. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(3):453.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Whitehouse JD, Friedman ND, Kirkland KB, Richardson WJ, Sexton DJ. The impact of surgical-site infections following orthopedic surgery at a community hospital and a university hospital: adverse quality of life, excess length of stay, and extra cost. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002;23(4):183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaye KS, Schmader KE, Sawyer R. Surgical site infection in the elderly population. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(12):1835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. White MC, Holman DM, Boehm JE, Peipins LA, Grossman M, Henley SJ. Age and cancer risk: a potentially modifiable relationship. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(3 Suppl 1):S7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Brownie S. Why are elderly individuals at risk of nutritional deficiency? Int J Nurs Pract. 2006;12(2):110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Makrantonaki E, Wlaschek M, Scharffetter-Kochanek K. Pathogenesis of wound healing disorders in the elderly. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2017;15(3):255.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Institute of Medicine Division of Health P, Disease P. Risk factors for infection in the elderly. In: Berg RL, Cassells JS, editors. The second fifty years: promoting health and preventing disability. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). Copyright © 1990 by the National Academy of Sciences; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. de Jong L, Klem TMAL, Kuijper TM, Roukema GR. Factors affecting the rate of surgical site infection in patients after hemiarthroplasty of the hip following a fracture of the neck of the femur. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(8):1088.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lau ACK, Neo GH, Lee HC. Risk factors of surgical site infections in hip hemiarthroplasty: a single-institution experience over nine years. Singapore Med J. 2014;55(10):535.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Noailles T, Brulefert K, Chalopin A, Longis PM, Gouin F. What are the risk factors for post-operative infection after hip hemiarthroplasty? Systematic review of literature. Int Orthop. 1843;40(9):2016.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ridgeway S, Wilson J, Charlet A, Kafatos G, Pearson A, Coello R. Infection of the surgical site after arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87-B(6):844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu X, Dong Z, Li J, Feng Y, Cao G, Song X, et al. Factors affecting the incidence of surgical site infection after geriatric hip fracture surgery: a retrospective multicenter study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):382.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Summers S, Grau LC, Massel DH, Ong A, Orozco F, Rosas S, et al. Trends in utilization of total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the United States. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2018;47(12). https://doi.org/10.12788/ajo.2018.0103.

  21. Organization WH. Definition of an older or elderly person. 2010

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sabharwal S, Wilson H, Reilly P, Gupte CM. Heterogeneity of the definition of elderly age in current orthopaedic research. Springerplus. 2015;4:516.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Urquhart DM, Hanna FS, Brennan SL, Wluka AE, Leder K, Cameron PA, et al. Incidence and risk factors for deep surgical site infection after primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(8):1216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Akinleye SD, Garofolo G, Culbertson MD, Homel P, Erez O. The role of BMI in hip fracture surgery. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2018;9:2151458517747414.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Cordero-Ampuero J, de Dios M. What are the risk factors for infection in hemiarthroplasties and total hip arthroplasties? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(12):3268.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ismael H, Horst M, Farooq M, Jordon J, Patton JH, Rubinfeld IS. Adverse effects of preoperative steroid use on surgical outcomes. Am J Surg. 2011;201(3):305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Evans RP. Surgical site infection prevention and control: an emerging paradigm. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(Supplement_6):2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bratzler DW, Houck PM. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Am J Surg. 2005;189(4):395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dellinger EP, Gross PA, Barrett TL, Krause PJ, Martone WJ, McGowan JE Jr, et al. Quality standard for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical procedures. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;18(3):422.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Li JT, Markus PJ, Osmon DR, Estes L, Gosselin VA, Hanssen AD. Reduction of vancomycin use in orthopedic patients with a history of antibiotic allergy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75(9):902.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Oishi CS, Carrion WV, Hoaglund FT. Use of parenteral prophylactic antibiotics in clean orthopaedic surgery. A review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;296:249. https://journals.lww.com/clinorthop/Abstract/1993/11000/Use_of_Parenteral_Prophylactic_Antibiotics_in.41.aspx.

  32. Buehlmann M, Frei R, Fenner L, Dangel M, Fluckiger U, Widmer AF. Highly effective regimen for decolonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29(6):510.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kalmeijer MD, Coertjens H, van Nieuwland-Bollen PM, Bogaers-Hofman D, de Baere GA, Stuurman A, et al. Surgical site infections in orthopedic surgery: the effect of mupirocin nasal ointment in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35(4):353.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kalmeijer MD, van Nieuwland-Bollen E, Bogaers-Hofman D, de Baere GA. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus is a major risk factor for surgical-site infections in orthopedic surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2000;21(5):319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Veiga DF, Damasceno CA, Veiga-Filho J, Figueiras RG, Vieira RB, Garcia ES, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of chlorhexidine showers before elective plastic surgical procedures. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30(1):77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Anglen JO, Gainor BJ, Simpson WA, Christensen G. The use of detergent irrigation for musculoskeletal wounds. Int Orthop. 2003;27(1):40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Burd T, Christensen GD, Anglen JO, Gainor BJ, Conroy BP, Simpson WA. Sequential irrigation with common detergents: a promising new method for decontaminating orthopedic wounds. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1999;28(3):156.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cheng MT, Chang MC, Wang ST, Yu WK, Liu CL, Chen TH. Efficacy of dilute betadine solution irrigation in the prevention of postoperative infection of spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(15):1689.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Engesaeter LB, Espehaug B, Lie SA, Furnes O, Havelin LI. Does cement increase the risk of infection in primary total hip arthroplasty? Revision rates in 56,275 cemented and uncemented primary THAs followed for 0-16 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2006;77(3):351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kopp SL, Berbari EF, Osmon DR, Schroeder DR, Hebl JR, Horlocker TT, et al. The impact of anesthetic management on surgical site infections in patients undergoing total knee or total hip arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 2015;121(5):1215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sebastian A, Huddleston P, Kakar S, Habermann E, Wagie A, Nassr A. Risk factors for surgical site infection after posterior cervical spine surgery: an analysis of 5,441 patients from the ACS NSQIP 2005–2012. Spine J. 2016;16(4):504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Huntley SR, Lee S, Kalra R, McGwin G, Naranje S, Shah A. Associations between season and surgical site infections in orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery. Foot. 2018;37:61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Whiting PS, White-Dzuro GA, Avilucea FR, Dodd AC, Lakomkin N, Obremskey WT, et al. Body mass index predicts perioperative complications following orthopaedic trauma surgery: an ACS-NSQIP analysis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017;43(2):255.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 140 Bergen Street, Suite D-1610, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA

    Arjun Gupta, John Shin, Dylan Oliver, Michael Vives & Sheldon Lin

Authors
  1. Arjun Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dylan Oliver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael Vives
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sheldon Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by J. S., A. G., and D. O. The first draft of the manuscript was written by A.G. and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. The manuscript was critically revised by M.V. and S. L. The study was supervised by M. V. and S. L. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sheldon Lin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study qualified as exempt by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Rutgers University, since the investigation was conducted retrospectively using a large, publicly-available database consisting of de-identified patient information. All protocols were conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The need to acquire informed consent was not applicable to this study, since the investigation was conducted retrospectively using a large, publicly-available database consisting of de-identified patient information.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

M. V. serves on the Editorial Boards of Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine and Spine Journal, as well as the Board of NASS. S. L. is a paid speaker for Treace, unpaid consultant for Bioventus, and founder of Cre Osso. S. L. serves on the Editorial Board of Foot and Ankle International, as well as the Board of AOFAS.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, A., Shin, J., Oliver, D. et al. Incidence and risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) after primary hip hemiarthroplasty: an analysis of the ACS-NSQIP hip fracture procedure targeted database. Arthroplasty 5, 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00155-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00155-2

Keywords

Arthroplasty

ISSN: 2524-7948

Contact us