Skip to main content
Download PDF

The effect of body mass index and preoperative weight loss in people with obesity on postoperative outcomes to 6 months following total hip or knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study

Arthroplasty volume 5, Article number: 48 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Few studies have investigated the association between obesity, preoperative weight loss and postoperative outcomes beyond 30- and 90-days post-arthroplasty. This study investigated whether body mass index (BMI) and preoperative weight loss in people with obesity predict postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes 6 months following total knee or hip arthroplasty.

Methods

Two independent, prospectively collected datasets of people undergoing primary total knee or hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis between January 2013 and June 2018 at two public hospitals were merged. First, the sample was grouped into BMI categories, < 35 kg/m2 and ≥ 35 kg/m2. Subgroup analysis was completed separately for hips and knees. Second, a sample of people with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 was stratified into participants who did or did not lose ≥ 5% of their baseline weight preoperatively. The presence of postoperative complications, Oxford Hip Score, Oxford Knee Score, EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale and patient-rated improvement 6 months post-surgery were compared using unadjusted and adjusted techniques.

Results

From 3,552 and 9,562 patients identified from the datasets, 1,337 were included in the analysis after merging. After adjustment for covariates, there was no difference in postoperative complication rate to 6 months post-surgery according to BMI category (OR 1.0, 95%CI 0.8–1.4, P = 0.8) or preoperative weight loss (OR 1.1, 95%CI 0.7–1.8, P = 0.7). There was no between-group difference according to BMI or preoperative weight change for any patient-reported outcomes 6 months post-surgery.

Conclusion

Preoperative BMI or a 5% reduction in preoperative BMI in people with obesity was not associated with postoperative outcomes to 6 months following total knee or hip arthroplasty.

Background

Arthroplasty is often recommended for end-stage osteoarthritis that is unresponsive to pain medication, physiotherapy and lifestyle modification. According to the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), 97.7% and 88.3% of the primary total knee (TKA) and hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures respectively, are performed for osteoarthritis [1]. Of those, 57.5% of TKA and 39.5% of THA recipients are classified with obesity at the time of surgery [1]. Concerningly, obesity has been identified as a potential contributing factor to a greater rate of post-arthroplasty complications, including infection [2, 3], poor wound outcomes [4] and pulmonary emboli [5]. Furthermore, compared to people with a normal body mass index (BMI), obesity is associated with worse long-term patient-reported functional outcomes [2, 6], reduced mobility [6] and inadequate physical activity levels following THA or TKA [7].

Many studies have investigated the association between obesity, defined by BMI, and postoperative complications. Overall, the literature is conflicting. Some studies demonstrated no association between obesity and postoperative complications [8,9,10] while other studies showed that complication rates rose with increasing BMI [4, 11,12,13,14,15,16]. In particular, people with morbid obesity experience significantly greater rates of superficial and deep infection, sepsis, reoperation and readmission than those classified as overweight or having obesity [4, 13]. Regarding the evidence linking obesity with greater postoperative complications in the short-term, most studies have been retrospective in design [4, 5, 16,17,18,19] and few have investigated this association beyond 30- or 90-days post-surgery [18, 19]. Further, little is known about the effect of preoperative weight loss in people with obesity undergoing TKA or THA on postoperative outcomes. While retrospective, this study of prospectively collected data will provide a more complete perspective regarding the incidence of postoperative complications among people with obesity undergoing primary TKA or THA, their association with patient-reported outcomes to 6-months post-surgery, and whether weight loss preoperatively among those with obesity predicts patient outcomes. Thus, results from this study can be used to inform further research regarding the potential benefits of preoperative weight-loss interventions and postoperative outcomes.

Methods

Study design

A retrospective study of prospectively collected data from two Australian public hospital cohorts undergoing primary TKA or THA was conducted. Data were obtained from two independent clinical databases, the Arthroplasty Clinical Outcomes Registry National (ACORN) and Osteoarthritis Chronic Care Program (OACCP) [20, 21]. Ethics approval was obtained from the South Western Sydney Local Health District (SWSLHD) Human Research Ethics Committee (2020/ETH01867).

Recruitment and screening

Eligible participants were identified from data collected between January 2013 and June 2018 inclusive. The cohort included adults with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis who underwent primary elective THA or TKA (unilateral or bilateral) and could be matched between the two datasets during this period. The second joint for an individual who appeared more than once was excluded so that all admissions were for one joint only. Individuals who elected to opt out were not included in the dataset.

Data source and extraction

ACORN data collection

The ACORN database collected data from patients undergoing TKA or THA at multiple Australian public and private hospitals. Data were captured at three-time points only: prior to surgery, on discharge from the hospital, and 6 months post-surgery. Preoperative demographic, anthropometric, and comorbidity data, along with patient-reported outcome measures (Oxford Knee or Hip Score and the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale [EQ-VAS]), were collected directly from patients within 2–6 weeks before surgery and their medical records by site coordinators. Acute care data, including the number and type of postoperative complications, were extracted from the medical record. Outcomes post-discharge to 6 months following surgery were collected from the patient by telephone by ACORN research officers. Outcomes included complications, the number and reasons for readmission to 6 months post-surgery, the Oxford Knee or Hip Score, EQ-VAS and the patient-rated improvement from surgery. Visits to the emergency department were collected to capture complication rates and were not categorized as readmission. Thus, visits to the emergency department were recorded as complications. The ACORN database uses an opt-out consent process. Data were collected from consecutive patients who underwent surgery. Those who elected to opt-out or who did not have surgery were not included in the dataset. Non-English-speaking patients were included in the dataset and completed translated outcome measures, where available, or were assisted by a nominated carer. This approach was shown to be reliable when compared to using healthcare interpreters for the administration of patient surveys following arthroplasty in patients with limited English proficiency [22].

OACCP data collection

The OACCP is a program across NSW public hospitals designed to improve the coordination of care and conservative management of individuals with osteoarthritis wait-listed for surgery [20]. OACCP data for this study were obtained from assessments conducted by clinical staff at two public hospitals within SWSLHD. Assessments were conducted on admission to the waitlist (baseline) and three months after the initial assessment. Some participants were reviewed 6 and 12 months after their initial assessment if indicated according to their needs or risk category. The following data were collected: anthropometric measures (age, weight, height, BMI, and waist and hip circumferences), comorbidities, highest level of education, language spoken at home and patient-reported outcome measures (the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Hip Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)). Data were collected from consecutive patients. The KOOS and HOOS data were used to describe the sample at baseline but were not used in data analysis. There were no exclusion criteria for the OACCP database.

Outcomes of interest

The primary outcome of interest was the presence or absence of postoperative complications to 6 months post-surgery. The types of complications included in the analysis are described in Table 1. The secondary outcomes of interest were patient-reported outcome measures at 6 months post-surgery: Oxford Knee Score or Oxford Hip Score, the EQ-VAS, and patient-rated improvement from surgery. The Oxford Knee Score and Oxford Hip Score are questionnaires that evaluate patient perceptions of joint pain and function experienced during the previous four weeks [23]. Patient perception regarding their general health status was assessed with the EQ-VAS. Participants rated their overall health on a 0 to 100 mm visual analog scale ranging from “worst possible” (0) to “best possible” health (100). Patient-rated improvement from surgery was assessed by the question “Overall, how are the problems now with your hip/knee compared to before your operation” and responses were measured on a Likert scale (“much worse”, “a little worse”, “about the same”, “a little better”, and “much better”). This question was based on questions measuring the patient’s perceived satisfaction and success of surgery used by the National Joint Registry in England and Wales [21].

Table 1 Types of postoperative complications collected for analysis
Full size table

Exposures of interest

The main exposure of interest in this study was BMI stratified according to two categories: BMI < 35 kg/m2 and BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2. A BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2, was chosen as the cut-off based on evidence demonstrating a greater incidence of postoperative complications in people undergoing TKA or THA with BMIs greater than 35 kg/m2 compared to those with BMIs ranging from 30–34.99 kg/m2 [14, 15].

The secondary exposure of interest was the amount of preoperative weight loss in a sub-group of the sample consisting of participants with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) stratified into two categories: participants who lost 5% or more of their baseline weight preoperatively and those who did not. Preoperative weight change was calculated by subtracting the earliest recorded BMI in the OACCP dataset from the pre-surgical BMI recorded in the ACORN dataset. A minimum of 5% weight loss was chosen based on current literature which demonstrated clinically meaningful benefits for pain reduction [24, 25] and improvement of obesity-related comorbidities such as glycemia [26]. Furthermore, existing data from the OACCP at Fairfield Hospital indicated that approximately 10–15% of patients lost 5% of their baseline weight before surgery. Data regarding how and why patients lost weight before surgery was not collected. As part of the OACCP, patients received general weight management advice from a nurse and physiotherapist. There was no dietitian input at the two hospitals from which the data is obtained. Weight loss was not a requirement for surgery. Due to the small number of people with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 losing weight before surgery and the subsequent impact on power to detect a significant difference between groups, a threshold of BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 was used in this analysis.

Covariates

The following variables were identified a-priori as potential confounders to the association between BMI or weight loss (BMI reduction) and outcomes: age, sex, surgery type (TKA or THA), unilateral or bilateral procedure, American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) score, comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, lung disease, stomach or gastrointestinal conditions, renal failure, liver disease, neurological condition and depression or anxiety) and musculoskeletal conditions including low back pain and other lower limb joint problems that interfere with mobility. The inclusion of these covariates was based on established research showing that these variables may be associated with the outcomes of interest [4, 5, 11,12,13, 16]. Pre-surgical Oxford scores, education level and language spoken at home were also used as covariates in adjusted analyses where patient-reported outcome measures were the outcome of interest. The decision to include these covariates was based on current literature demonstrating worse patient-reported outcomes in populations with lower pre-surgical scores [27, 28] and education level [29]. Language spoken at home was used as a surrogate for cultural background based on research revealing an association between non-Caucasian populations and worse patient-reported outcomes [30]. Age and Oxford scores were measured as continuous variables while sex, surgery type, ASA score, comorbidities, education level and language spoken at home (stratified into either “English” or “other”) were treated as categorical variables.

Sample size

The planned analysis was based on an estimated sample size of approximately 3,000 cases from the merged ACORN and OACCP datasets. For the primary analysis regarding the association between BMI and postoperative complications, it was anticipated that approximately 30% of cases would have a complication based on local data [31]. A sample size of 353 cases per group would have 80% statistical power to detect a statistically significant (alpha = 0.05, 2-tailed) difference between groups of 10% (30% in the BMI < 35 kg/m2 group vs. 40% in the BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 group), excluding confounding variables.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, percentages) were used to report the characteristics of the cohort and primary and secondary outcomes. Records with missing data and invalid scores (e.g., Oxford score > 48) were removed.

Binary logistic regression was used to determine whether a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 was associated with postoperative complications in the acute postoperative period (from surgery to discharge from hospital) and to 6 months post-surgery (separate analyses). The analyses included all complications listed in Table 1 and results were adjusted for the covariates. Sensitivity analysis was completed using only major complications defined as: deep surgical site infection, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, respiratory infection, fracture, dislocation, stroke, cardiac complications, revision surgery, readmission, and death. Furthermore, because the effect of obesity depends on the operated joint, a subgroup analysis was completed to investigate the association between BMI and postoperative complications separately for hips and knees.

Binary logistic regression was also used to determine the association between preoperative weight loss and postoperative complications to 6 months in people with obesity. Sensitivity analyses were completed for major complications in the acute period and to 6 months post-surgery separately. Covariates were included to adjust for possible confounding factors. Separate analysis according to type of arthroplasty was completed for TKA, but not THA due to the small sample size in the sub-sample.

Linear regression was used to determine the association between Oxford and EQ-VAS scores for both exposures of interest. Ordinal logistic regression was planned for analysis of the patient-rated improvement from surgery. However, because the sample was not adequately powered, binary logistic regression was used with the category denoted ‘much better’ on the 5-point Likert scale compared to all other responses.

The final regression models were achieved by including the following covariates: age, sex, surgery type, ASA and all comorbidity covariates. For patient-reported outcomes, education level, whether participants spoke English and pre-surgical Oxford score were included in the models in addition to the aforementioned covariates.

The logistic models were assessed using the Hosmer and Lemeshow test for goodness of fit and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (Additional file 1). The following classification was used for the area under the curve for the ROC: no discrimination (< 0.5), poor discrimination (0.5–0.69), acceptable discrimination (0.7–0.79), excellent discrimination (0.8–0.89) and outstanding discrimination (≥ 0.9) [32]. The linear regression models were assessed using R2, the residuals vs. fitted values plot, the quantile–quantile (Q-Q) plot, the scale-location plot, and Cook’s distance plot. All statistical analyses were performed with R Environment for Statistical Computing (version 4.2.0) [33].

Results

Screening and Recruitment

Sample derivation is shown in Fig. 1. A total of 3,552 and 9,562 patients were identified in the OACCP and ACORN databases respectively. After merging the datasets and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 1,337 participants with complete data remained for the primary analysis of the association between BMI and postoperative complications. Following the removal of invalid Oxford scores, 1,228 participants were retained for the secondary analysis of the association between BMI and patient-reported outcome measures. Participants with BMI under 30 kg/m2 were then removed to create the sub-sample of participants with obesity for analysis of preoperative weight change with respect to postoperative complications (n = 809) and patient-reported outcome measures (n = 747).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Sample derivation flow chart

Full size image

Participant characteristics

Baseline characteristics for the overall sample (n = 1337), including the division between BMI category and type of arthroplasty, and the sub-sample of participants with obesity (n = 809) are listed in Tables 2 and 3, respectively.

Table 2 Baseline characteristics for the overall sample
Full size table
Table 3 Baseline characteristics according to weight change in patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2
Full size table

Primary analysis according to BMI category

Postoperative complications

The incidence of postoperative complications is described in Tables 4 and 5. Overall, participants with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 experienced more complications to 6 months post-surgery compared to those with BMI < 35 kg/m2 though the difference was not significant (40% vs. 37%, P = 0.3). The types of complications are described in Table 1.

Table 4 Postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes to 6 months post-surgery according to BMI category and arthroplasty type
Full size table
Table 5 Postoperative complications and patient-reported outcome measures to 6 months post-surgery according to weight change in patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2
Full size table

The results from unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses of postoperative complications are presented in Tables 6 and 7, respectively. After adjusting for covariates, there was no significant difference in postoperative complications to 6 months post-surgery according to BMI category (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.8–1.4, P = 0.8). The area under the ROC curve indicated a poor level of discrimination (0.62). Obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2) was not associated with higher odds of major complications in the acute postoperative period (surgery to discharge from hospital) and to 6 months post-surgery. A similar area under the ROC curve was obtained for the acute postoperative period (0.67) and post-acute period to 6 months post-surgery (0.64).

Table 6 Results of unadjusted regression models for postoperative complications and patient-reported outcome measures according to BMI and preoperative weight change
Full size table
Table 7 Results of adjusted regression models for postoperative complications and patient-reported outcome measures according to BMI and preoperative weight change
Full size table

Subgroup analysis was undertaken to investigate the association between complications and obesity according to arthroplasty type. Adjusted logistic regression analysis did not show a statistically significant difference in complication rate to 6 months post-surgery for TKA (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.6–1.2, P = 0.4) or THA (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.8–2.8, P = 0.2) according to BMI (Table 7). The area under the ROC curve was 0.62 for TKA and 0.63 for THA.

Patient-reported outcome measures

Mean Oxford Knee Scores and Oxford Hip Scores at 6 months post-surgery were similar regardless of BMI category. Participants with a BMI of 35 kg/m2 or greater scored lower on the EQ-VAS (mean 72.5 [SD 19.6] vs. 76.5 [SD 18.1], P = 0.001). Overall, over 70% of participants rated their operated joint as “much better” compared to before surgery. After adjusting for covariates, there was no statistically significant difference between groups according to BMI for any patient-reported outcome measure at 6 months post-surgery (Table 7). The area under the curve was 0.61 (poor) for the ROC curve of an association between BMI and patient-rated improvement from surgery.

Secondary analysis according to preoperative weight loss

Postoperative complications

The presence of complications to 6 months post-surgery was similar in those losing 5% or more of their baseline weight compared to those who did not (41% vs. 38%, P = 0.7). After adjusting for covariates, preoperative weight loss was not associated with lower odds of overall (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.7–1.8, P = 0.7) or major complications (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.6–2.5, P = 0.6). The area under the ROC curve was 0.63 for overall complications and 0.62 for major complications. There was no statistically significant difference in complication rate to 6 months post-surgery for TKA according to preoperative weight loss (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.4–1.2, P = 0.2). A separate analysis was not completed for THA due to the small sample size in the sub-sample.

Patient-reported outcome measures

Mean Oxford Hip and Knee Scores at 6 months post-surgery were similar regardless of preoperative weight change. After adjusting for covariates there was no statistically significant difference between groups according to preoperative weight change for any patient-reported outcome measure at 6 months post-surgery (Table 7). The area under the curve was 0.59 (poor) for the association between preoperative weight loss and patient-rated improvement from surgery.

Discussion

This retrospective study did not identify an association between the presence of obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2) and complications or patient-reported outcomes 6 months post-surgery. Furthermore, the odds of developing a postoperative complication to 6 months post-surgery and worse patient-reported outcomes were not found to differ between patients with obesity who lost 5% or more of their baseline weight compared to those who did not.

Our findings are consistent with previous research which reported no association between postoperative complications and obesity [8,9,10], specifically obesity class I (BMI 30–34.99) and II (BMI 35–39.99) [34, 35]. However, the literature is conflicting with other studies suggesting obesity is associated with postoperative complications following TKA and THA, in particular, deep vein thrombosis [18], pulmonary embolism [5, 18], wound infection [18, 19] and revision surgery [36]. The lack of statistically significant findings may be explained by the use of BMI to measure obesity. While BMI accounts for an increase in body weight, it does not differentiate between the proportion of lean muscles to adipose tissue [37, 38]. Thus, healthy individuals with high muscle mass and a lower risk of postoperative complications may be classified as obesity. In fact, earlier studies concluded that obesity may be a protective factor associated with lower odds of early postoperative complications following TKA or THA [39,40,41,42]. Similarly, BMI does not distinguish between peripheral and visceral fat (the latter being fat associated with a greater risk of postoperative complications) [43]. Another possible explanation relates to an individual’s cardiometabolic risk profile. It is suggested that people with obesity and a normal cardiometabolic risk profile do not have a heightened risk for postoperative complications when compared to people with a healthy weight [42]. This may explain the lack of statistically significant findings in our study as our participants were enrolled in an optimization program (OACCP) while awaiting surgery. Participants with uncontrolled comorbidities (i.e., those with an increased risk of experiencing a postoperative complication based on the severity of their comorbidities) who did not proceed to surgery were not included in the dataset.

Concerning preoperative weight loss, our study did not demonstrate lower odds of experiencing a postoperative complication with 5% weight loss or more before undergoing TKA or THA. However, while there was no statistically significant association, there was a trend for lower odds of complications in participants undergoing TKA who lost 5% of their baseline weight. Our study may have been underpowered to detect a significant difference as only a small proportion of participants with obesity lost 5% of their baseline weight (n = 102). Thus, this issue requires further investigation. Evidence supporting the notion that preoperative weight loss reduces postoperative complications is derived from a recent study involving bariatric surgery as the weight loss intervention before TKA [44]. It provides the first confirmatory (and causal) evidence that significant preoperative weight loss in people with severe obesity (defined by the authors as BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2) does have a reduced risk for postoperative complications. Patients with severe obesity who underwent laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and lost up to 20% of their baseline weight before TKA experienced fewer complications than the group who did not undergo bariatric surgery (14.6% vs. 36.6%, mean difference 22%; 95%CI 3.7%–40.3%, P = 0.02) [44].

Beyond the aforementioned study, there are also data from lower-level studies suggesting the benefit of weight loss may not be universal [45, 46]. For example, a retrospective study of 14,784 patients did not find a significant reduction in the risk of surgical site infections and 90-day readmission in patients with obesity who lost 5% of their body weight before TKA or THA [45]. The authors proposed that 5% weight loss preoperatively was insufficient to reduce complication risk. That is, the weight loss may not have been sufficient to change an individual’s BMI classification or improve their comorbidities. Similarly, a recent retrospective study investigating the effect of non-surgical preoperative weight loss in 1,589 patients undergoing THA found that complications were higher amongst those who lost weight [47]. It found that weight loss from a BMI >40kg/m2 to a BMI <40kg/m2 was associated with an increased risk of readmissions and complications. The authors hypothesized that patients who lost weight were at greater risk of postoperative complications, regardless of their weight loss, due to their comorbidity profile. It was also unclear whether the weight loss was intentional or occurred due to other circumstances such as illness which could have increased risk.

Regarding patient-reported outcome measures, our findings are consistent with other studies demonstrating similar improvement in patient-reported pain and function among people with and without obesity [36, 48], and that there is no significant association between BMI and patient-reported outcomes [36, 49]. However, the literature is conflicted with some studies reporting lower postoperative satisfaction levels following TKA [50] and worse patient-reported outcomes following TKA or THA in people with obesity [48, 51, 52]. The authors proposed that the experience of healthcare delivery and preoperative expectations influenced postoperative satisfaction in addition to BMI [50]. Concerning joint-specific or health-related patient-reported outcomes, the authors hypothesized that postoperative outcomes were limited by lower preoperative scores [52] and highlighted the importance of assessing the change score which revealed similar improvement in people with and without obesity [52].

Strengths and limitations

This study has several strengths. First, it used prospectively collected data sourced from comprehensive databases. Second, unlike other retrospective studies investigating the association between obesity and postoperative outcomes up to 90 days post-surgery, this study evaluated outcomes to 6 months post-surgery. Thus, due to the longer follow-up period, this study captured arthroplasty-related complications that may occur beyond the commonly investigated 90-days postoperative period, such as revision surgery. Third, adjusted analysis was performed to account for the effect of comorbidities associated with postoperative complications in patients with obesity (e.g., diabetes and hypertension). Finally, to our knowledge, this is one of the few retrospective studies to analyze complication rates according to preoperative weight change that does not focus on bariatric surgery [45, 47].

The limitations of this study were related to the retrospective study design. Due to the non-random sampling, the results may have been influenced by unknown confounders regardless of our analyses that adjusted for known confounders. Furthermore, there were missing data due to loss to follow-up at 6 months post-surgery and errors in data entry. The proportion of patients with obesity who lost 5% or more of their baseline weight was small and thus regression analysis was not powered to detect an important difference. Additionally, the focus on 5% weight loss might have been too small to reduce complications. Finally, by adjusting for comorbidities, we may have hidden any association with obesity by adjusting for mediating variables. For example, if obesity (which is associated with higher rates of diabetes) affects postoperative complications because of the higher rate of diabetes, adjusting for diabetes will hide that effect.

Conclusion

This retrospective study did not find a significant association between BMI and complications to 6 months or patient-reported outcomes following TKA or THA. Further, there was no significant association between preoperative weight loss in people with obesity and postoperative complications or patient-reported outcomes. Adequately powered studies are needed to confirm or deny our findings, with consideration given to whether 5% weight loss is sufficient to reduce post-operative complications.

Availability of data and materials

Data relevant to this retrospective study are found in the article and supplementary file. Further data will be made upon request from the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body Mass Index

OR:

Odds Ratio

AOANJRR:

Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

TKA:

Total knee arthroplasty

THA:

Total hip arthroplasty

ACORN:

Arthroplasty Clinical Outcomes Registry National

OACCP:

Osteoarthritis Chronic Care Program

SWSLHD:

South Western Sydney Local Health District

EQ-VAS:

EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale

KOOS:

Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score

HOOS:

Hip Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score

ASA:

American Society of Anaesthesiology

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

95% CI:

95% Confidence interval

References

  1. Glyn-Jones S, Palmer A, Agricola R, Price A, Vincent T, Weinans H, et al. Osteoarthritis. Lancet. 2015;386(9991):376–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pozzobon D, Ferreira PH, Blyth FM, Machado GC, Ferreira ML. Can obesity and physical activity predict outcomes of elective knee or hip surgery due to osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ Open. 2018;8(2):e017689.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Servien E, Dunn W, Dahm D, Bramer JAM, Haverkamp D. The influence of obesity on the complication rate and outcome of total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic literature review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(20):1839–44.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Zusmanovich M, Kester BS, Schwarzkopf R. Postoperative complications of total joint arthroplasty in obese patients stratified by BMI. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(3):856–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sloan M, Sheth N, Lee GC. Is obesity associated with increased risk of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism after hip and knee arthroplasty? A large database study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019;477(3):523–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Naylor JM, Harmer AR, Heard RC. Severe other joint disease and obesity independently influence recovery after joint replacement surgery: an observational study. Aust J Physiother. 2008;54(1):57–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hodges A, Harmer AR, Dennis S, Nairn L, March L, Crawford R, et al. Prevalence and determinants of physical activity and sedentary behaviour before and up to 12 months after total knee replacement: a longitudinal cohort study. Clin Rehabil. 2018;32(9):1271–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Andrew JG, Palan J, Kurup HV, Gibson P, Murray DW, Beard DJ. Obesity in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90-B(4):424–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Amin AK, Patton JT, Cook RE, Brenkel IJ. Does obesity influence the clinical outcome at five years following total knee replacement for osteoarthritis? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88-B(3):335–40.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stickles B, Phillips L, Brox WT, Owens B, Lanzer WL. Defining the relationship between obesity and total joint arthroplasty. Obes Res. 2001;9(3):219–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. George J, Piuzzi NS, Ng M, Sodhi N, Khlopas AA, Mont MA. Association between body mass index and thirty-day complications after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(3):865–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Werner BC, Higgins MD, Pehlivan HC, Carothers JT, Browne JA. Super obesity is an independent risk factor for complications after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(2):402–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Scully W, Piuzzi NS, Sodhi N, Sultan AA, George J, Khlopas A, et al. The effect of body mass index on 30-day complications after total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2020;30(2):125–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. DeMik DE, Kohler JG, Carender CN, Glass NA, Brown TS, Bedard NA. What is the impact of body mass index cutoffs on total hip arthroplasty complications? J Arthroplasty. 2022;37(7):1320-5.e1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. DeMik DE, Muffly SA, Carender CN, Glass NA, Brown TS, Bedard NA. What is the impact of body mass index cutoffs on total knee arthroplasty complications? J Arthroplasty. 2022;37(4):683-7.e1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mullen JT, Moorman DW, Davenport DL. The obesity paradox: body mass index and outcomes in patients undergoing nonbariatric general surgery. Ann Surg. 2009;250(1):166–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hartford JM, Graw BP, Frosch DL. Perioperative complications stratified by body mass index for the direct anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35:2652–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wallace G, Judge A, Prieto-Alhambra D, de Vries F, Arden NK, Cooper C. The effect of body mass index on the risk of post-operative complications during the 6 months following total hip replacement or total knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014;22(7):918–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilson CJ, Georgiou KR, Oburu E, Theodoulou A, Deakin AH, Krishnan J. Surgical site infection in overweight and obese total knee arthroplasty patients. J Orthop. 2018;15(2):328–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation Musculoskeletal Network. Osteoarthritis Chronic Care Program Model Of Care. ACI Musculoskeletal Network; 2012:8–10. https://aci.health.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/165306/Osteoarthritis-Chronic-Care-Program-Mode-of-Care-High-Resolution.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2021.

  21. Churches T, Naylor J, Harris IA. Arthroplasty Clinical Outcomes Registry National (ACORN) Annual Final Report (2013–2018). Sydney: Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Xue D, Churches T, Armstrong E, Mittal R, Naylor JM, Harris IA. Interpreter proxy versus healthcare interpreter for administration of patient surveys following arthroplasty: a pilot study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):206.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard DJ, Carr AJ, et al. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89-B(8):1010–4.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Messier SP, Mihalko SL, Legault C, Miller GD, Nicklas BJ, DeVita P, et al. Effects of intensive diet and exercise on knee joint loads, inflammation, and clinical outcomes among overweight and obese adults with knee osteoarthritis: the IDEA randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310(12):1263–73.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Atukorala I, Makovey J, Lawler L, Messier SP, Bennell K, Hunter DJ. Is there a dose-response relationship between weight loss and symptom improvement in persons with knee osteoarthritis? Arthritis Care Res. 2016;68(8):1106–14.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wilding JPH. The importance of weight management in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Clin Pract. 2014;68(6):682–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Demetriou C, Webb J, Sedgwick P, Afzal I, Field R, Kader D. Preoperative factors affecting the patient-reported outcome measures following total knee replacement: socioeconomic factors and preoperative OKS have a clinically meaningful effect. J Knee Surg. 2022;35(9):940–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Batailler C, Lording T, De Massari D, Witvoet-Braam S, Bini S, Lustig S. Predictive models for clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic analysis. Arthroplasty today. 2021;9:1–15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Greene ME, Rolfson O, Nemes S, Gordon M, Malchau H, Garellick G. Education attainment is associated with patient-reported outcomes: findings from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(6):1868–76.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Cohen-Levy WB, Lans J, Salimy MS, Melnic CM, Bedair HS. The Significance of race/ethnicity and income in predicting preoperative patient-reported outcome measures in primary total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2022;37(7s):S428–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Heo SM, Harris I, Naylor J, Lewin AM. Complications to 6 months following total hip or knee arthroplasty: observations from an Australian clinical outcomes registry. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):602.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Hosmer DW Jr. Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  33. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021. https://www.R-project.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fu MC, McLawhorn AS, Padgett DE, Cross MB. Hypoalbuminemia is a better predictor than obesity of complications after total knee arthroplasty: a propensity score-adjusted observational analysis. HSS J. 2017;13(1):66–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sloan M, Sheth NP, Nelson CL. Obesity and hypoalbuminaemia are independent risk factors for readmission and reoperation following primary total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(6_Supple_A):31–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Evans JT, Mouchti S, Blom AW, Wilkinson JM, Whitehouse MR, Beswick A, et al. Obesity and revision surgery, mortality, and patient-reported outcomes after primary knee replacement surgery in the National Joint Registry: a UK cohort study. PLoS Med. 2021;18(7):e1003704.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Valentijn TM, Galal W, Tjeertes EK, Hoeks SE, Verhagen HJ, Stolker RJ. The obesity paradox in the surgical population. Surgeon. 2013;11(3):169–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hainer V, Aldhoon-Hainerová I. Obesity paradox does exist. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(Supplement 2):S276.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Gurunathan U, Pym A, Anderson C, Marshall A, Whitehouse SL, Crawford RW. Higher body mass index is not a risk factor for in-hospital adverse outcomes following total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018;26(3):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gurunathan U, Anderson C, Berry KE, Whitehouse SL, Crawford RW. Body mass index and in-hospital postoperative complications following primary total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2018;28(6):613–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ma L, Yu X, Weng X, Lin J, Qian W, Huang Y. Obesity paradox among patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Surg. 2022;22(1):373.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Shaparin N, Widyn J, Nair S, Kho I, Geller D, Delphin E. Does the obesity paradox apply to early postoperative complications after hip surgery? A retrospective chart review. J Clin Anesth. 2016;32:84–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Doyle SL, Lysaght J, Reynolds JV. Obesity and post-operative complications in patients undergoing non-bariatric surgery. Obes Rev. 2010;11(12):875–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Dowsey MM, Brown WA, Cochrane A, Burton PR, Liew D, Choong PF. Effect of bariatric surgery on risk of complications after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open. 2022;5(4):e226722-e.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Inacio MC, Kritz-Silverstein D, Raman R, Macera CA, Nichols JF, Shaffer RA, et al. The impact of pre-operative weight loss on incidence of surgical site infection and readmission rates after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(3):458-64.e1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Laperche J, Feinn R, Myrick K, Halawi MJ. Obesity and total joint arthroplasty: Does weight loss in the preoperative period improve perioperative outcomes? Arthroplasty. 2022;4(1):47.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Middleton AH, Kleven AD, Creager AE, Hanson R, Tarima SS, Edelstein AI. Association between nonsurgical weight loss from body mass index >40 to body mass index <40 and complications and readmissions following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2022;37(3):518–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Halawi MJ, Gronbeck C, Savoy L, Cote MP. Effect of morbid obesity on patient-reported outcomes in total joint arthroplasty: a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Arthroplasty Today. 2019;5(4):493–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Baghbani-Naghadehi F, Armijo-Olivo S, Prado CM, Gramlich L, Woodhouse LJ. Does obesity affect patient-reported outcomes following total knee arthroplasty? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):55.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Giesinger JM, Loth FL, MacDonald DJ, Giesinger K, Patton JT, Simpson AHRW, et al. Patient-reported outcome metrics following total knee arthroplasty are influenced differently by patients’ body mass index. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(11):3257–64.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Deakin AH, Iyayi-Igbinovia A, Love GJ. A comparison of outcomes in morbidly obese, obese and non-obese patients undergoing primary total knee and total hip arthroplasty. The Surgeon. 2018;16(1):40–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Rajgopal V, Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW, Rorabeck CH. The impact of morbid obesity on patient outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(6):795–800.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study will contribute to a Ph.D. degree award for N.P. The authors acknowledge Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre for providing access to the ACORN and OACCP datasets. We acknowledge Joseph Descallar (Biostatistician, Ingham Institute) for their guidance with the statistical analysis.

Funding

The authors thank the Australian and New Zealand Musculoskeletal (ANZMUSC) Clinical Trials Network and Medibank Better Health Foundation (MBHF) for supporting this research with the Medibank Better Health Foundation PhD Scholarship awarded to N.P. The funder has no role in influencing the design or reporting of the retrospective study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. South Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2170, Australia

    Natalie Pavlovic, Ian A. Harris & Justine Naylor

  2. Fairfield Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, 2176, Australia

    Natalie Pavlovic & Robert Boland

  3. Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, 2170, Australia

    Ian A. Harris, Furkan Genel & Justine Naylor

  4. School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia

    Ian A. Harris

  5. Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia

    Robert Boland & Bernadette Brady

  6. Liverpool Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, 2170, Australia

    Bernadette Brady

  7. School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, 2560, Australia

    Bernadette Brady

  8. Faculty of Medicine and Health, St George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2217, Australia

    Furkan Genel

Authors
  1. Natalie Pavlovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ian A. Harris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert Boland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bernadette Brady
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Furkan Genel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Justine Naylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Authors N.P., J.N., I.A.H., R.B. and B.B. were involved in the protocol development for the retrospective study. N.P., I.A.H., J.N. and F.G. were involved in data analysis. All authors contributed to the writing of the related manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalie Pavlovic.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval was obtained from the South Western Sydney Local Health District (SWSLHD) Human Research Ethics Committee (2020/ETH01867).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

There is no conflict of interest in this project.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness of fit tests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pavlovic, N., Harris, I.A., Boland, R. et al. The effect of body mass index and preoperative weight loss in people with obesity on postoperative outcomes to 6 months following total hip or knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study. Arthroplasty 5, 48 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-023-00203-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-023-00203-5

Keywords

Arthroplasty

ISSN: 2524-7948

Contact us